The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YOSUF M. TARAKI, DALE A. TRSAR,
RICHARD H. SHEPHERD, MARK H. PETERSON
and TYRONE J. MORITZ
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0968
Application No. 08/629,484
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before RUGGIERO, LEVY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 6 and 8 through 21. Claim 7 has
been canceled.
We reverse.
BACKGROUND
Appellants’ invention relates generally to digital waveform
analyzers or oscilloscopes and more specifically, to engine
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007