Ex Parte VENKATESWAR et al - Page 8




              Appeal No. 2000-0975                                                                                       
              Application No. 08/956,402                                                                                 

              Interferences, unless good cause is shown.”) and § 1.192(c)(8)(iv) (the brief must point                   
              out the errors in the rejection).                                                                          


                                                    CONCLUSION                                                           
                     The rejection of claims 1-7 and 10-14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                
              unpatentable over Gauthier, Molnar, and Guttag is affirmed.  The rejection of claims 8                     
              and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Gauthier, Molnar, and Guttag                        
              is reversed.                                                                                               
                     The examiner’s decision in rejecting claims 1-14 is thus affirmed-in-part.                          





















                                                           -8-                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007