Appeal No. 2000-1085 Application No. 08/980,349 oxide doped with phosphorus taught in Okuda since such powder is not expected to be dispersible in forming a conductive layer. See the Brief, pages 4-5. This argument, however, is not persuasive as it is not supported by any objective evidence. It is well settled that mere arguments in the Brief or conclusory statements in the specification cannot take the place of objective evidence. See In re De Blauwe, 736 F.2d 699, 705, 222 USPQ 191, 196 (Fed. Cir. 1984). In any event, by indicating superiority of its specifically prepared tin oxide doped with phosphorus over both tin oxide doped with antimony and carbon, Okuda impliedly teaches that its conductive material does not suffer from the drawbacks of both carbon and tin oxide doped with antimony (drawbacks include dispersibility problems). The appellant argues (Brief, page 5) that: the pigment of the invention possesses unexpected advantages over Bruckner’s pigment (mica flakes crated with antimony doped tin oxide) with respect to temperature and weathering stability. Bruckner’s pigment is generally calcined at 800 C. (See, e.g.,o col. 4, lines 9-10), and the highest temperature of the acceptable range of heating temperatures in only 900 C o (See, e.g., col. 3, lines 28-30); on information andPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007