The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CECILE JOUBERT, BRIGITTE LOISEAUX, JEAN-PIERRE HUIGNARD, and ANNE DELBOULBE ____________ Appeal No. 2000-1201 Application No. 08/817,825 ____________ HEARD: Jan. 17, 2002 ____________ Before KRASS, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL The examiner rejected the claims 3 and 10-12. The appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal is an illumination system for an electrooptic color display screen. A holographic separator receives a white light beam from a light source; separates the white light into red, green, and bluePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007