Ex Parte WILLMAN et al - Page 13



          Appeal No. 2000-1260                                                            
          Application 08/518,852                                                          

               additional peripheral status or configuration storage                      
               registers and a novel software driven means for                            
               dynamically reconfiguring the system without user                          
               interaction.  The system of the present invention                          
               includes means for determining the peripheral status                       
               and updating the configuration data to permit use of                       
               the computer to begin without executing a user prompted                    
               initialization sequence or requiring manual switches or                    
               jumpers to be reset each time the user changes                             
               environments.                                                              
          See column 1 lines 53-64 of Garner.                                             
               Upon reviewing both Bertram and Garner supra, we find                      
          nothing in either reference that supports the Examiner’s position               
          that either of these references teach the limitations of claim 26               
          as previously discussed.                                                        
               In addition, Appellants argue that “[t]he Combination of the               
          Bertram and Garner References Does Not Suggest Retrieving a                     
          Second Set of Configuration Data in Response to an Automated                    
          Determination That a First Set Of Configuration Data Was Not                    
          Successfully Used For Configuration”.  See page 14 lines 24-27 of               
          the Brief.  The Appellants further argue that the combination of                
          Bertram and Garner “would still use Bertram’s manual indication                 
          to configure using the ROM-based default configuration data,                    
          whereas appellants’ claims recite computer-implemented steps that               
          avoid this manual indication.”  (Emphasis added).  See page 15                  
          lines 8-10 of the Brief.  Appellants also argue that “[t]he                     
                                            13                                            




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007