The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MARK A. SMERZNAK,
WALTER A.M. BROECKX,
IWEIN J.M.J. GODERIS,
ROGER J. JONES,
DIANE PARRY,
JAY I. KAHN,
and
JEAN WEVERS
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-1877
Application No. 08/881,457
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HANLON, OWENS, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the final rejection of claims 1-17, all the claims pending in the
application. The claims on appeal are directed to a non-aqueous
liquid detergent. Claim 1 is representative and reads as
follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007