The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 52
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LUC MONTAGNIER, JEAN-CLAUDE CHERMANN,
FRANCOISE BARRE-SINOUSSI, FRANCOISE BRUN-VEZINET,
CHRISTINE ROUZIOUX, WILLY ROZENBAUM,
CHARLES DAUGUET, JACQUELINE GRUEST,
MARIE-THERESE NUGEYRE, FRANCOISE REY,
CLAUDINE AXLER-BLIN, SOLANGE CHAMARET,
ROBERT C. GALLO, MIKULAS POPOVIC, and
MANGALASSERIL G. SARNGADHARAN
__________
Appeal No. 2000-1929
Application No. 08/019,297
__________
HEARD December 11, 2001
__________
Before WINTERS, ADAMS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 28-30, 35, 36, 42, and 45-48. Claims 43 and 44 have
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007