Ex Parte YAMAGUCHI et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-1954                                                        
          Application No. 08/593,459                                                  


          The invention pertains to a circuit for a camera.  Claim 1                  
          is illustrative and reads as follows:                                       
               1.  A charging circuit, comprising:                                    
               a transformer which transforms a supplied voltage and                  
               supplies said transformed voltage to a load to be                      
               charged;                                                               
               a switching device which is connected with said                        
               transformer; and                                                       
               a controller which detects a voltage which is applied                  
               from a power source to said transformer, and determines                
               whether or not said voltage is equal to or larger than                 
               a prescribed value, and controls said switching device                 
               to switch on and off in different manners in accordance                
               with said determination so that the charging of the                    
               load is performed in different manners.                                
               The reference relied upon by the examiner is:                          
          Hauenstein           4,150,306         Apr. 17, 1979                        
               Claims 1-4, 6, 8-10, 12-14, 23, 24 and 26 stand rejected               
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Hauenstein.                      
              The respective positions of the examiner and the appellants             
          with regard to the propriety of this rejection are set forth in             
          the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 25) and the appellants’ brief              
          and reply brief (Paper Nos. 24 and 27, respectively).                       





                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007