Appeal No. 2000-1998 Page 8 Application No. 08/828,523 claim 28.6 Accordingly, we shall not sustain the examiner’s obviousness rejection of claims 28-34, 36-38, 45 and 47. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 28-34, 36-38, 45 and 47 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED FRED E. McKELVEY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT RICHARD E. SCHAFER ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JENNIFER D. BAHR ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 6 Consequently, it is not necessary for us to discuss appellant’s declaration under 37 CFR § 1.131 in this decision.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007