The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PETER A. FRANKLIN, ARTHUR G. MERRYMAN,
RAJESH S. PATEL, and THOMAS A. WASSICK
____________
Appeal No. 2000-2143
Application No. 08/743,405
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before NASE, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 5 and claims 16 to 20, which are all of
the claims pending in this application. Claims 6 to 15 have been
canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007