The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ERHAN H. GUNDAY, MICHAEL DOLITON,
PAUL FOUNG and JOHN R. LEE
____________
Appeal No. 2000-2208
Application No. 08/874,2871
____________
ON BRIEF2
____________
Before THOMAS, LEVY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 35-37, 42 and 44, which are all of the claims
pending in the present application.
We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed June 13, 1997, which is a continuation
of Application No. 08/465,446, filed June 5, 1995, now abandoned, which is a
divisional of Application No. 08/066,969, filed May 24, 1993, now U.S. Patent
5,469,209, which is a divisional of Application No. 07/731,079, filed July 16,
1991, now U.S. Patent 5,249,056.
2 The oral Hearing set for May 7, 2002 was waived by Appellants in a
communication, received by facsimile, on March 21, 2002.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007