Ex Parte BLANTS et al - Page 1




                                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                   
                                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                                                                                Paper No. 22                   
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                               ____________                                                                    
                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                                                       
                                                               ____________                                                                    
                                     Ex parte LIOUDMILA BLANTS and PETTERI SAARINEN                                                            
                                                               ____________                                                                    
                                                           Appeal No. 2000-2238                                                                
                                                        Application No. 08/826,922                                                             
                                                               ____________                                                                    
                                                                  ON BRIEF                                                                     
                                                               ____________                                                                    
                Before FLEMING, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                            


                                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                   
                         A patent examiner rejected claims 1-4, 6-9, and 11-14.  The appellants appeal                                         
                therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                                                               


                                                             BACKGROUND                                                                        
                         The appellants’ invention creates a message for transmission via a short                                              
                message service (“SMS”).  The SMS is a method of communication used by digital                                                 
                mobile phones wherein a character string is transmitted through a communication                                                
                network without establishing a telephone connection therein.  (Spec. at 1.)                                                    







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007