Appeal No. 2000-2238 Page 4 Application No. 08/826,922 input request, selecting a user response to each request. . . ." Similarly, independent claim 7 specifies in pertinent part the following limitations: "the communication device presents to the user data input options according to said structure. . . .” Also similarly, independent claim 13 specifies in pertinent part the following limitations: "storing at least one application in said storage medium, wherein said application includes, a series of questions relating to said application, a series of answers to said questions, and a series of message components, suitable for transmission in the short message service, correlated to said answers; . . . answering said series of presented questions by selecting from the stored series of answers through the use of the input device. . . .” Similarly, independent claim 14 specifies in pertinent part the following limitations: " a memory for storing a separate data input request for each field and at least one input response for each request; a display for presenting the stored input response to the user; a data input device for allowing the user to select a stored input response. . . .” Giving the independent claims their broadest, reasonable construction, the limitations require that a communications device stores, presents to a user, or allows a user to select one or more predetermined answers to at least one question. “[H]aving ascertained exactly what subject matter is being claimed, the next inquiry must be into whether such subject matter is novel.” In re Wilder, 429 F2d 447, 450, 166 USPQ 545, 548 (CCPA 1970). “A claim is anticipated only if each and everyPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007