Appeal No. 2001-0008 Application 09/298,572 In the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 13), the examiner withdrew Great Britain Patent No. 1,542,709 from the obviousness-type double patenting and 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejections on the basis that it did not further add to the teachings of Cotting. In addition, since the close of the briefing period, copending Application No. 09/016,619 issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,265,487 on July 24, 2001, thereby converting the provisional obviousness-type double patenting rejection to an actual rejection. Thus, the claims currently stand rejected as follows: 1. Claims 1-3 and 6 are rejected under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,265,487 in view of Cotting; and 2. Claims 1-3, 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Mizumura and the Japanese patent in view of Cotting. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007