Appeal No. 2001-0008 Application 09/298,572 of 150EC to 250EC are preferred. Mizumura teaches that it is known in the art to lower curing temperatures by accelerating the thermo-setting reaction rate. However, Mizumura notes that “fluidity of the composition in a molten state is reduced and it becomes difficult to form a smooth film.” (Mizumura, col. 1, l. 26-31.) The Examiner opines that it would have been obvious to have cured the powder coatings of Mizumura and the Japanese patent at a temperature of as low as 100EC as per Cotting in order to reduce the energy expenditure required at a higher temperatures. See supra, p.7. Given the teachings of the references to the contrary and the Examiner’s failure to provide support for his position, we find that the Examiner’s obviousness determination can only be based upon improper hindsight reasoning. See W. L. Gore & Assoc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1550, 220 USPQ 303, 311 (Fed. Cir. 1983)(it is error to find obviousness where references “diverge from and teach away from the invention at hand ”). “To imbue one of ordinary skill in the art with knowledge of the invention in suit, when no prior art reference or references of record convey or suggest that knowledge, is to 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007