Ex Parte WALLACE et al - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2001-0079                                                       
         Application No. 09/092,702                                                 

         More particularly, the device has a protective shell which houses          
         a flexible pouch which contains the ink or other liquid to be              
         dispensed.                                                                 
              Claim 7 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                 
         follows:                                                                   
                   7.  In a liquid containment and dispensing device                
              having a rigid, generally cup-shaped outer shell with an              
              open end, a chassis secured to the open end of the shell,             
              the chassis having a pumping mechanism with a liquid inlet            
              thereinto and a liquid outlet therefrom, wherein the chassis          
              has a perimetrical wall, the improvement wherein:                     
                   the perimetrical wall of the chassis fits snugly within          
              the open end of the shell, one of the perimetrical wall of            
              the chassis and the open end of the shell having at least             
              one outwardly projecting bead, the other of the perimetrical          
              wall of the chassis and the open end of the shell having at           
              least one radially inwardly projecting recess, the at least           
              one bead being received in the at least one recess in a snap          
              fit.                                                                  
              The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                       
         Muscala                       4,758,456           Jul. 19, 1988            
         Gross                         5,246,147           Sep. 21, 1993            
         Oda et al.                    5,552,816           Sep. 03, 1996            
                                                 (filed May  28, 1993)              
         Ujita et al. (Ujita)     EP 0 562 717 A1          Sep. 29, 1993            
         (Published European Patent Application)                                    
              Claims 7-10, 19-22, 25, and 26 stand finally rejected under           
         35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner              
         offers Gross in view of Oda with respect to claims 7, 19, 25, and          
         26, Gross in view of Muscala with respect to claims 8 and 20, and          
         Gross in view of Ujita with respect to claims 9, 10, 21, and 22.           

                                         2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007