Ex Parte WALLACE et al - Page 12




         Appeal No. 2001-0079                                                       
         Application No. 09/092,702                                                 

         (Fed. Cir. 1997).  For the above reasons, since the Examiner’s             
         prima facie case of obviousness remains unrebutted by any                  
         convincing arguments of Appellants, the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.               
         § 103(a) rejection of independent claims 7 and 19 is sustained.            
              In summary, with respect to the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.                  
         § 103(a) rejection of the appealed claims, we have sustained the           
         rejection of claims 7 and 19, but have not sustained the                   
         rejection of claims 8-10, 20-22, 25, and 26.  Therefore, the               
         Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 7-10, 19-22, 25, and 26 is            
         affirmed-in-part.                                                          





















                                         12                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007