Appeal No. 2001-0249 Application No. 08/786,494 Moreover, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 19, 20, 23, 24, 27-30 and 35 under 35 U.S.C. 103. Since we have sustained the rejection of claim 35 under 35 U.S.C. 112, first and second paragraphs, due to a lack of any argument by appellants, but we have not sustained the rejections of claims 17-35 based on prior art, the examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) ERROL A. KRASS )BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND )INTERFERENCES ) ) ) -6–Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007