Ex Parte CHEN et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2001-0274                                                        
          Application No. 09/136,527                                                  

               Claims 3-7, 11-14 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103            
          as unpatentable over Myers in view of Sandhu.                               

               Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the                     
          respective positions of appellants and the examiner.                        

                                       OPINION                                        

               With regard to independent claim 1, the examiner points to             
          Figures 2 and 3 of Myers and identifies a first dielectric layer            
          204, a patterned metal layer 202 having gaps formed on the first            
          dielectric layer, wherein the patterned metal layer has a metal             
          feature with an upper surface and a composite structure                     
          comprising a bottom layer 22, an intermediate metal layer 224 and           
          an upper anti-reflective coating 228, and a second dielectric               
          layer 210 formed on the patterned metal layer.  A through-hole              
          318 having an internal surface formed in the second dielectric              
          layer exposes a portion of the upper surface of the metal                   
          feature, wherein the exposed portion of the upper surface has a             
          concave section 320 (also seen in Figure 2 at 216) formed during            
          etching the through-hole and the concave section extends beneath            
          and undercuts the anti-reflective coating 228.  A conductive                
                                         -3–                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007