Ex Parte PFEUFFER - Page 7


                Appeal No. 2001-0344                                                                                                           
                Application 08/900,254                                                                                                         

                taken” comes nowhere from the prior art” (Appeal Brief, page 5, lines 11-13); however,                                         
                Appellant has undertaken no efforts to distinguish the Yamamoto or Norton processes.                                           
                         The Examiner having made the prima facie case of obviousness, the burden then                                         
                shifted to the Applicant to show that these elements were not present in the prior art.                                        
                See, e.g. In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252, 1255, 195 USPQ 430, 433-4 (CCPA 1977)                                                     
                         Where . . . the claimed and prior art products are identical or substantially                                         
                         identical, or are produced by identical or substantially identical processes, the                                     
                         PTO can require an applicant to prove that the prior art products do not                                              
                         necessarily or inherently possess the characteristics of his claimed product.                                         
                         Whether the rejection is based on “inherency” under 35 U.S.C. § 102, on “prima                                        
                         facie obviousness” under 35 U.S.C. § 103, jointly or alternatively, the burden of                                     
                         proof is the same, and its fairness is evidenced by the PTO’s inability to                                            
                         manufacture products or to obtain and compare prior art products.                                                     
                         We return to Yamamoto, column 8, lines 37-43, to delve into the disclosure more                                       
                fully.  The Examiner has pointed to the Yamamoto sheets in Examples 13 and 14                                                  
                (which appear to have comparable properties to the rest of the Yamamoto sheets).  We                                           
                note that these sheets were calendered at a working width of 50 cm under a pressure of                                         
                10 tons at a temperature of 180°C and 130°C.                                                                                   
                         Yamamoto discloses it is known to use various types of synthetic fibers in non-                                       
                woven sheets, including polypropylene, acrylic, and polyvinyl alcohol fibers (col. 1, lines                                    
                20-23). Drawn polyester was specifically used as a staple fiber in Examples 13 and 14.                                         
                In these examples, 4 kg of cut, the drawn polyester fibers are combined with 1 kg of                                           
                apparently untreated water insoluble polyvinyl alcohol fiber binder, “each fiber having a                                      
                denier of 1, a length of 3mm, and softening point of 70°C in water” (column 8, lines 24-                                       
                28) and a slurry created. The slurry is mixed with 1% polyacrylamide and subjected to a                                        
                paper making process before being calendered.                                                                                  


                                                                      7                                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007