Ex Parte HAGGQUIST et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                  
                  today was not written for publication and is not                    
                           binding precedent of the Board.                            

                                                             Paper No. 16             
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                           Ex parte GREGORY W. HAGGQUIST,                             
                                RONALD H. LEVIN, and                                  
                                   SCOTT T. MOSIER                                    
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2001-0389                                  
                             Application No. 09/237,880                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       
            Before KIMLIN, OWENS, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent              
            Judges.                                                                   
            PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                 
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                 This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection                
            of claims 1 through 26, 29, and 30, which are the remaining               
            claims in the application.                                                
                 The subject matter on appeal is represented by claim 1,              
            set forth below:                                                          
            1.  A charge transport layer, comprising a hydrazone                      
            charge transport compound, C.I. Solvent Yellow 138 and an                 
            ester-containing antioxidant.                                             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007