Ex Parte ANDREW et al - Page 15



          Appeal No. 2001-0550                                                        
          Application No. 09/030,792                                                  

                                     Conclusion                                       
               The obviousness-type double patenting rejection of claims 1,           
          2 and 9-14 based on claims 1-6 of US Patent 5,616,120, and the              
          obviousness-type double patenting rejection of claims 1, 2, and             
          9-14 based on claims 1-9 of US Patent 6,074,358, are affirmed.              
               All other rejections are reversed.                                     
               The decision of the examiner finally rejecting the appealed            
          claims is affirmed-in-part.                                                 


















                                         15                                           




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007