The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 42 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte AXEL KAHN, GILDAS LE GAL LA SALLE, JACQUES MALLET, MICHEL PERRICAUDET, MARC PESCHANSKI, and JEAN-JACQUES ROBERT __________ Appeal No. 2001-05621 Application No. 08/460,478 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTERS, ADAMS and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 81-102, 104-120, 122 and 123. Claims 124 and 125 are allowed. No other claims are pending in the application. 1 This appeal is related to Appeal No. 2001-1167 (Application No. 08/460,814) and 2001-1961 (Application No. 08/459,994). Accordingly, these appeals were considered together.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007