The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MICHAEL L. VAZQUEZ, RICHARD A. MUELLER,
JOHN J. TALLEY, DANIEL P. GETMAN, GARY A. DECRESCENZO,
JOHN N. FRESKOS, ROBERT M. HEINTZ and DEBORAH E. BERTENSHAW
__________
Appeal No. 2001-0598
Application No. 08/451,090
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, ADAMS, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1-6, 8-10, 12, 13, 24, 26 and 28. Claims 7, 11 and 14-23,
the only remaining pending claims in this application, are indicated as allowed over
the prior art of record. See Brief, page 2.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007