Ex Parte BUSEY et al - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2001-1057                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/741,470                                                                                  


              chat session and, in response thereto, changing the chat session from a first to a                          
              second chat session.  Thus, in claim 9, there is no need for the user to go back through                    
              the procedure of finding and joining a session, with the accompanying queries, as in                        
              Anupam.                                                                                                     


                     Again, we agree with the examiner.  Claim 9 is reciting nothing more than a                          
              dynamic change in chat sessions.  As pointed out by the examiner [answer-page 5], this                      
              is an “inherent” capability of the Anupam system since anyone can readily log on to                         
              many chat room sessions with a mere command from a user, wherein the command is                             
              the “request,” as claimed.  We agree with the examiner that this function is “inherent” to                  
              any system which is connected to the World Wide Web, such connection being made                             
              merely by a simple command (mouse click) by a user.  Moreover, appellants have not                          
              challenged the examiner’s allegation of inherency.                                                          


                     With regard to appellants’ argument that Anupam cannot “directly” change to a                        
              new chat session and that there is no need for the user to go back through the                              
              procedure of finding and joining a session, to whatever extent there is any merit in such                   
              arguments, they are not based on any specifically identified claim language and, so, are                    
              not persuasive.                                                                                             



                                                            7                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007