Ex Parte VAN DYKE - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                                                                                              Paper No. 48                 

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                      __________                                                           

                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                      __________                                                           
                                              Ex parte KNOX Van DYKE                                                       
                                                      ___________                                                          
                                                 Appeal No. 2001-1164                                                      
                                              Application No. 08/293,745                                                   
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                            
                                                      __________                                                           
              Before WINTERS, WILLAM F. SMITH, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
              WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        
                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                     This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 66 through                        
              83, 89 through 99, and 105 through 156, which are all of the claims remaining in the                         
              application.                                                                                                 


                                                 Representative Claim                                                      
                     Claim 66, which is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, reads as follows:                    










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007