Appeal No. 2001-1512 3 Application No. 09/273,541 closing the exhaust valve so that all of the heat transfer gas passing the pressure control valve is delivered to a gap between the substrate and a substrate mounting surface of a substrate holder; measuring the pressure of the heat transfer gas which is flowing in the gap between the substrate and the substrate mounting surface of the substrate holder; supplying the measured pressure to the pressure control valve; automatically controlling the flow rate of the heat transfer gas with the pressure control valve on the basis of a difference between the set pressure value and the measured pressure such that the measured pressure of the heat transfer gas becomes equal to the set pressure value and the flow rate corresponds to a leakage rate of the heat transfer gas; and assessing a state of the gap between the substrate and the substrate mounting surface on a basis of a comparison of the heat transfer gas flow rate with a standard value. The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Tezuka 4,771,730 Sep. 20, 1988 White 5,822,172 Oct. 13, 1998 (filed Jan. 7, 1997) Claims 4 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Tezuka in view of White. We make reference to the answer (Paper No. 26, mailed November 7, 2000) for the Examiner’s complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 25, filedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007