Ex Parte HILLMERING - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2001-1602                                                        
          Application No. 08/973,003                                                  
          Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the Examiner, we           
          make reference to the brief1 and the answer2 for the details                
          thereof.                                                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               We will reverse the rejection of claims 1-7.                           
               With regard to independent claims 1 and 7, Appellant argues            
          that Danish does not disclose that only the depression of exactly           
          two mutually adjacent keys will generate an alpha-character.  See           
          Brief, page 4, lines 17-19.  Appellant argues that since only               
          some of the Danish's alpha-characters are generated using two               
          keys, Danish does not disclose a keyboard where an alpha-                   
          character is always and only generated by depressing two mutually           
          adjacent keys.  See Brief, page 5, lines 7-8 and 14-17.                     
               The Examiner argues that the Danish keyboard could be                  
          modified by one of ordinary skill in the art to allow all the               
          alpha-characters to be generated using two adjacent keys.  The              



               1 Appellant filed an Appeal Brief on October 20, 2000.  We             
          will refer to this appeal brief as simply the Brief.   Appellant            
          filed a reply brief on April 9, 2001.  We will refer to this                
          reply brief as the Reply Brief.                                             
               2                                                                      
               2 The Examiner responded to Appellant's Appeal Brief on                
          February 9, 2001.  We will refer to this answer as simply the               
          Answer.                                                                     
                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007