Ex Parte WILLIS et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2001-1626                                                                                      
              Application No. 09/007,622                                                                                

                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The invention is directed to a method and apparatus for managing delivery of                       
              data in a communications system having a number of content providers and content                          
              consumers.  Representative claim 12 is reproduced below.                                                  
                     12.    A method for managing delivery of content by a data processing system                       
                     within a communications system, wherein a plurality of content providers and a                     
                     plurality of content consumers are located within the communications system,                       
                     the method comprising the data processing system implemented steps of:                             
                            receiving a request to accept delivery of content at the data processing                    
                     system and to transmit the content to the plurality of content consumers at a                      
                     selected time, wherein the request originates from a requesting content provider                   
                     within the plurality of content providers;                                                         
                            determining when the content may be transmitted to the plurality of                         
                     content consumers based on available resources at the data processing; and                         
                            accepting delivery of the content from the requesting content provider                      
                     based on a determination of when the content may be transmitted.                                   
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                   
              Greenwood et al. (Greenwood)              5,568,181                   Oct. 22, 1996                       
              Miller et al. (Miller)                    5,920,701                   Jul.   6, 1999                      
                                                                             (filed Aug. 28, 1996)                      
              Teng et al. (Teng)                        5,930,473                   Jul. 27, 1999                       
                                                                             (filed Mar.  8, 1996)                      
                     Claims 1, 3-8, 10-19, and 21-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                      
              unpatentable over Greenwood and Miller.                                                                   
                     Claims 9 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                         
              over Greenwood, Miller, and Teng.                                                                         
                                                          -2-                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007