The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DAVID P. STRAUSS, THOMAS J. HUNT, and PAUL S. GILMAN ___________ Appeal No. 2001-1776 Application No. 08/881,948 __________ ON BRIEF _________ Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 9 through 13, 23 and 24, which are the only claims remaining in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to appellants, the invention is directed to a one- piece target, i.e., a single homogenous piece of sputtering material, with threaded holes proximate to its periphery so that the target may be bolted to the interior of the chamber withPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007