The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KENNETH A. KRIENKE, KAY Y. BLOHOWIAK,
LARRY K. OLLI, and JOSEPH H. OSBORNE
___________
Appeal No. 2001-1820
Application No. 09/169,280
__________
ON BRIEF
_________
Before WARREN, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 17, 24 and 25.1 Claims 9-14,
22, 23, 26 and 27 stand withdrawn from further consideration by
the examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b)(Brief, page 2).
Claims 18, 20, 21 and 28-31, the remaining claims pending in this
application, stand allowed by the examiner (Brief, page 2; final
1Appellants’ amendment after the final rejection was refused
entry by the examiner (see the amendment dated Apr. 24, 2000,
Paper No. 10, refused entry as per the Advisory Action dated May
3, 2000, Paper No. 11).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007