The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TRAVIS CARRICO, MARK BRYANT and ROBERT WILSON, JR.
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1875
Application No. 09/193,257
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 12, all of the claims pending in
this application.
Appellants' invention relates to a method of playing a
multi-draw, poker-type card game that may be played as either
a table game or a computer video game in a casino using a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007