Appeal No. 2001-1875 Application No. 09/193,257 single, conventional 52-card deck or a computer simulation of such a deck. Claim 1 defines a method of play involving a computer and video display screen, while claim 7 defines a table game method of play. Independent claims 1 and 7 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of those claims may be found in the Appendix to appellants' brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the claims on appeal are: Wood 4,743,022 May 10, 1988 Weingardt 5,042,818 Aug. 27, 1991 Miller 5,255,915 Oct. 26, 1993 Scarne, John; Scarne's Encyclopedia of Card Games; 1983, Harper & Row, Publishers: New York, pp. 14-15, 31. Claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 9 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Wood in view of Scarne, more particularly, Scarne's "Pokino" game (page 31). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007