Appeal No. 2001-1875 Application No. 09/193,257 As for the examiner's rejections of claims 2, 6, 8 and 10, and claims 3 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), we have reviewed the teachings of both Miller and Weingardt, but find nothing in those references which provides for that which we have found lacking in the basic combination to Wood and Scarne. Accordingly, the examiner's rejections of dependent claims 2, 3, 6, 8, 10 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) will not be sustained. In light of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007