The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte GEORGE PARADISSIS,
R. SAUL LEVINSON,
MITCHELL I. KIRSCHNER and
MARC S. HERMELIN
__________
Appeal No. 2001-1909
Application No. 09/016,786
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, LORIN, and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims
50-61, all the claims pending in the application.1
1 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b), we review the adverse decision of the examiner. In doing so, we
have considered the record, including:
· Final Rejection (paper no. 6);
· Brief (paper no. 10);
· Examiner's Answer (paper no. 11); and,
· Reply Brief (paper no. 12).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007