Ex Parte NAGAHARA et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-2184                                                        
          Application 09/005,364                                                      

          a semiconductor wafer.  Claim 17 is illustrative:                           
               17. A method for planarizing a first surface of a                      
          semiconductor wafer using chemical mechanical polishing, the                
          method comprising:                                                          
               holding the semiconductor wafer over a chemical mechanical             
          polishing pad;                                                              
               applying a non-uniform pressure distribution directly over a           
          second surface of the semiconductor wafer, said non-uniform                 
          pressure distribution comprising a plurality of different                   
          positive pressures and at least one negative pressure applied               
          simultaneously at different positions over the second surface of            
          the semiconductor wafer; and                                                
               polishing the first surface of the semiconductor wafer using           
          the chemical mechanical polishing pad, wherein the non-uniform              
          pressure distribution is applied directly over the second surface           
          of the semiconductor wafer while the first surface of the                   
          semiconductor wafer is polished.                                            
                                    THE REFERENCES                                    
          Nakashiba et al. (Nakashiba)       5,762,539       Jun.  9, 1998            
          (filed Feb. 27, 1997)                                                       
          Tanaka et al. (Tanaka)             5,797,789       Aug. 25, 1998            
          (filed May   5, 1997)                                                       
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 17, 19 and 21-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103           
          as being unpatentable over the combined teachings of Nakashiba              
          and Tanaka.                                                                 





                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007