Ex Parte LEMASTERS - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2001-2201                                                        
          Application .09/065, 997                                                    

          light and improve z-axis resolution, wherein the diameter of said           
          baffles is adjustable and wherein the position of said baffles              
          relative to the pinhole is adjustable in all dimensions for                 
          alignment.                                                                  
               27.   In a confocal microscope having a detection aperture             
          and a light detector, the improvement comprising an opaque baffle           
          positioned adjacent the detection aperture to block out-of-focus            
          light and improve z-axis resolution.                                        
                                     References                                       
               The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:               
               Admitted prior art (Figure 1 of Appellant’s specification)             
               Takahashi                     4,902,115      Feb. 20, 1990             
               Kino et al. (Kino)            4,927,254      May  22, 1990             
               Tanaami et al. (Tanaami)      5,579,157      Nov. 26, 1996             
                                 Rejections at Issue                                  
               Claims 1, 5, 27, 28 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Appellant’s admitted prior art             
          in view of Kino or Tanaami.                                                 
               Claims 4 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being           
          unpatentable over Appellant’s admitted prior art in view of Kino            
          and Takahashi or Tanaami and Takahashi.                                     





               Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the                   
                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007