Ex parte HAYASHI et al. - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written         
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                  

                                                                                      Paper No. 21            


                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                ____________                                                  

                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                         Ex parte KAZUHIKO HAYASHI,                                           
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2001-2327                                             
                                           Application No. 08/835,460                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
            NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                




                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 7 to 10.        
            Claim 12 has been allowed.  Claim 11 has been objected to as depending from a non-                
            allowed claim.  Claims 1 to 6 have been canceled.                                                 


                   We REVERSE.                                                                                








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007