Ex Parte GATES et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication in a law journal                 
               and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                                               Paper No. 30           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                  Ex parte DENNIS E. GATES and SCOTT E. GREENFIELD                    
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 2001-2351                                  
                             Application No. 08/772,443                               
                                                                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                                                                     

          Before URYNOWICZ, FLEMING and BARRY, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     


          Decision on Appeal                                                          
          This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4,                  
          9, 11, 12, 17-26 and 31-34.  In the answer at page 7, lines 16-             
          18, the examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 24 and 25,           
          and has indicated that those claims are allowable.                          
                    The invention pertains to a controller.  Claim 1 is               
          illustrative and reads as follows:                                          

                                         -1–                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007