Ex Parte MORRISON et al - Page 1




                                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                             
                                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     
                                                                                                           Paper No. 14                 
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                            ____________                                                                
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                                   
                                                            ____________                                                                
                                       Ex parte JAMES MORRISON and JOHN C. ADDY                                                         
                                                            ____________                                                                
                                                        Appeal No. 2002-0015                                                            
                                                     Application No. 09/164,098                                                         
                                                            ____________                                                                
                                                               ON BRIEF                                                                 
                                                            ____________                                                                
               Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                      


                                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               
                       A patent examiner rejected claims 1-20.  The appellants appeal therefrom under                                   
               35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                                                                         


                                                          BACKGROUND                                                                    
                       The appellants’ invention is a self-service checkout terminal.  In the grocery                                   
               industry, an impetus to reduce labor costs has focused on reducing the labor required                                    
               to process items purchased by a customer.  (Spec. at 1.)  More specifically, self-service                                
               checkout terminals operated by a customer without the aid of a checkout clerk have                                       
               been developed.  Using such a terminal, the customer scans items for purchase and                                        






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007