The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JAMES MORRISON and JOHN C. ADDY ____________ Appeal No. 2002-0015 Application No. 09/164,098 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL A patent examiner rejected claims 1-20. The appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse. BACKGROUND The appellants’ invention is a self-service checkout terminal. In the grocery industry, an impetus to reduce labor costs has focused on reducing the labor required to process items purchased by a customer. (Spec. at 1.) More specifically, self-service checkout terminals operated by a customer without the aid of a checkout clerk have been developed. Using such a terminal, the customer scans items for purchase andPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007