Appeal No. 2002-0015 Page 6
Application No. 09/164,098
The examiner fails to allege, let alone show, that the addition of Flom, Bang,
Faulkner, or Chen cures the aforementioned deficiency. Therefore, we reverse the
obviousness rejections of claims 1-20.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejections of claims 1-20 under § 103(a) are reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007