The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENNETH TUROS
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0022
Application No. 09/161,071
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, FRANKFORT and NASE,
Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 39 to 50,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
1We note that the appellant has requested an oral hearing (Paper No. 27, filed July 2, 2001), but
under the circumstances a hearing is not considered necessary. See 37 CFR § 1.194(c), last sentence, as
amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53131 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz.
Pat. Office 63, (Oct. 21, 1997).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007