Appeal No. 2002-0022 Page 6
Application No. 09/161,071
Since the claimed cleat having a substantially hemispherical chamber or a
hemispherical chamber is not taught or suggested by the applied prior art for the reasons
set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 39 to 50 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 39 to 50 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
HARRISON E. McCANDLISH )
Senior Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007