The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID A. BERNHARDT
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0095
Application No. 09/378,051
____________
HEARD: MAY 7, 20021
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 7
through 18. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining
in the application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a bowling ball insert and
a bowling ball assembly. A basic understanding of the invention
can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 7 and 9 ,
1 At the request of appellant, a telephonic hearing took
place on the specified hearing date.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007