Ex Parte BERNHARDT - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2002-0095                                                        
          Application No. 09/378,051                                                  


               In the main brief (page 3), appellant sets forth that claims           
          7 through 12 stand or fall together, and that claims 13 through             
          18 stand or fall together.  Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.192(c)(7), we              
          select claims 7 and 13 for review, infra, with the remaining                
          dependent claims of each claim grouping standing or falling with            
          their respective independent claim.                                         


                                       OPINION                                        


               In reaching our conclusion on the anticipation issue raised            
          in this appeal, this panel of the Board has carefully considered            
          appellant’s specification and claims 7 and 13,3 the applied                 
          patent, and the respective viewpoints of appellant and the                  
          examiner.  As a consequence of our review, we make the                      
          determination which follows.                                                







               3 As noted below, claims 7 and 13 include informalities                
          therein. However, reading these claims in light of the underlying           
          disclosure allows us to comprehend the metes and bounds thereof             
          and assess the claimed subject matter relative to the applied               
          prior art.                                                                  
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007