Appeal No. 2002-0095 Application No. 09/378,051 In the main brief (page 3), appellant sets forth that claims 7 through 12 stand or fall together, and that claims 13 through 18 stand or fall together. Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.192(c)(7), we select claims 7 and 13 for review, infra, with the remaining dependent claims of each claim grouping standing or falling with their respective independent claim. OPINION In reaching our conclusion on the anticipation issue raised in this appeal, this panel of the Board has carefully considered appellant’s specification and claims 7 and 13,3 the applied patent, and the respective viewpoints of appellant and the examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the determination which follows. 3 As noted below, claims 7 and 13 include informalities therein. However, reading these claims in light of the underlying disclosure allows us to comprehend the metes and bounds thereof and assess the claimed subject matter relative to the applied prior art. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007