The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GLENN A. POMERANTZ ____________ Appeal No. 2002-0116 Application No. 09/457,730 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 21 and 23 1 to 30. Claims 31 to 40 have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention. Claims 1 to 20 and 22 have been canceled. We REVERSE. 1Claims 21, 23 and 29 were amended subsequent to the final rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007