Ex Parte SRINIVASAN et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2002-0174                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 09/190,373                                                  

               the heating element, and a restricted portion                          
               therebetween which allows delivery of sufficient amount                
               of the heated air to soften the overlapping portions of                
               said thermoplastic sheets under and over said fastening                
               means, wherein said nozzle having said outlet with                     
               three portions therein being permanently set without                   
               allowing variations in the selective distribution of                   
               heated air over the overlapping portions of said                       
               thermoplastic sheets;                                                  
                    wherein as said welding apparatus is advanced                     
               longitudinally along the overlapping portions of said                  
               thermoplastic sheets while being heated by said heating                
               element softens to plasticity the upper surface of said                
               first thermoplastic sheet and the lower surface of said                
               second thermoplastic sheet and said pressure roller                    
               produces a weld on both sides of said line of fastening                
               means.                                                                 
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Murphy                        4,834,828           May  30, 1989             
          Chitjian                      4,855,004           Aug. 08, 1989             
          Hubbard et al. (Hubbard)      5,935,357           Aug. 10, 1999             
                                                  (filed Feb. 20, 1997)               
               Claims 1, 5-9 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as           
          being unpatentable over Murphy in view of Chitjian and Hubbard.             
               We refer to appellants’ brief and the answer for a complete            
          exposition of the opposing viewpoints of appellants and the                 
          examiner concerning the rejection before us.                                
               Upon careful review of the entire record including the                 
          respective positions advanced by appellants and the examiner, we            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007