Ex Parte LIPRIE - Page 11




          Appeal No. 2002-0933                                                        
          Application No. 09/325,944                                                  


          principles of inherency, each and every element or limitation of            
          a claimed invention.  See In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477,             
          44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431 (Fed. Cir. 1997) and RCA Corp. v. Applied              
          Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385,              
          388 (Fed. Cir. 1984).  Since Rague clearly does not disclose each           
          and every element of the system defined in appellant's claim 1 on           
          appeal, it follows that we will not sustain the examiner's                  
          rejection of that claim under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                   
          anticipated by Rague.                                                       


          Claims 2 through 7 depend either directly or indirectly from                
          claim 1 and thus include all the limitations thereof.  Therefore,           
          the examiner's rejection of dependent claims 2 through 7 under              
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Rague is also not                
          sustained.                                                                  


          Regarding the rejection of claims 9, 14 and 15 under                        
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Rague, the examiner              














Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007