Appeal No. 2002-0933
Application No. 09/325,944
through 7, 9, 14 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on Rague
has not been sustained; d) the rejection of claim 8 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Rague and Fischell
has not been sustained; and e) the rejection of claims 10 through
13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) has not been sustained.
In light of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner is
REVERSED.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007