Ex Parte MARUOKA et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-0970                                                        
          Application 09/181,814                                                      

          performance (see page 1 in the specification).  Representative              
          claim 1 reads as follows:                                                   
               1. A hollow golf ball comprising:                                      
               a hollow core composed of a hollow portion and at least one            
          hollow core outer layer defining the hollow portion and formed              
          from a composition comprising a rubber component, a resin                   
          component or mixtures thereof, and                                          
               a cover formed on the hollow core outer layer, wherein, when           
          a secondary natural frequency of the hollow golf ball is                    
          expressed as X (kHz) and a deformation amount, when applying from           
          an initial load of 10 kgf to a final load of 130 kgf on the                 
          hollow golf ball, is expressed as Y (mm), the difference of X-Y             
          is within the range of 0.1 to 1.5.2                                         
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1 through 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)            
          as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 5,150,906 to Molitor et             
          al. (Molitor), and in the alternative under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as           
          being obvious over Molitor.                                                 
               Attention is directed to the appellants’ main and reply                
          briefs (Paper Nos. 22 and 24) and to the examiner’s answer (Paper           
          No. 23) for the respective positions of the appellants and the              
          examiner regarding the merits of these rejections.                          












Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007